Solitera may collect certain information by automated means, such as cookies and web beacons, when a user visits our website. A “cookie” is a small piece of data that a website can send to your browser, which may then be stored on your system. learn more
See how STA is better than Postman
This report encapsulates the exceptional efficiency gains derived from our recent API scripting initiatives using SoliteraTA. By analyzing a variety of projects across multiple sectors, we have quantified significant improvements in key areas such as productivity, cost-effectiveness, maintenance, and execution time. Below is a pie chart that vividly illustrates the distribution of these enhancements, offering a clear visual representation of our achievements and the extraordinary impact of our technological advancements.
Script productivity gained
Cost Saving
Maintenace
Execution Time Saving
* Calculated based on multiple projects accross various sectors
* The data presented in the preceding pie chart demonstrates the extensive benefits that our API scripting efforts with SoliteraTA have delivered. Each slice of the chart reflects a critical area where significant gains have been realized, from dramatic cost reductions to enhanced execution speeds. These results not only validate our strategic focus on API testing technologies but also set a benchmark for future projects, underscoring our commitment to continuous improvement and operational excellence.
Comparsion STA vs Postman
| Feature | SoliteraTA | Postman |
|---|---|---|
Unified Testing Framework |
Can test multiple applications (API, desktop, mobile, web, database) using a single tool, reducing the need to use multiple applications for different types of testing. |
Focuses primarily on API testing and does not provide capabilities for UI, desktop, mobile, or database testing, requiring additional tools for comprehensive testing. |
Behavior-Driven Development (BDD) |
Uses Gherkin language with predefined step definitions in easy-to-understand English, promoting better collaboration and understanding among stakeholders. |
Requires manual definition of each API request and request body separately. Limited scope with JavaScript and not user-friendly for non-technical stakeholders. |
Data Reuse and Extraction |
Allows reuse of data and request bodies and can automatically extract values from response bodies for use in subsequent API requests, making the process seamless and automated. |
Each step must be manually defined and modifications to the request body must be done manually, making it less efficient and more error-prone. |
Seamless CI/CD Integration |
Easily integrates with CI/CD tools to automate API tests as part of the development workflow, ensuring continuous testing and quick feedback. |
Uses Newman for running collections in CI/CD pipelines but requires additional setup. |
Comprehensive Reporting |
Generates complete and detailed test reports and in case of any step failure, the tool provides specific reasons for the failure. |
Provides basic test results and logs without detailed failure analysis. |
Custom Validations |
Supports custom validations like partial verification of responses, offering greater flexibility in testing scenarios. |
Limited to basic validation, lacking advanced custom validation capabilities. |
Collaboration |
Facilitates easy collaboration among team members and stakeholders with features designed for teamwork. |
Collaboration is not as user-friendly, requiring manual sharing and management of tests. |